<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Economic Arguments Against Keynesian Proposals Can Balance Out Pro-Spending Coverage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timescheck.com/2010/07/15/economic-arguments-against-keynesian-proposals-can-balance-out-pro-spending-coverage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timescheck.com/2010/07/15/economic-arguments-against-keynesian-proposals-can-balance-out-pro-spending-coverage/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 23:50:38 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gregg Irving</title>
		<link>http://timescheck.com/2010/07/15/economic-arguments-against-keynesian-proposals-can-balance-out-pro-spending-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-18089</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg Irving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 15:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timescheck.com/?p=575#comment-18089</guid>
		<description>That is certainly truly worth it to read, and truly does make me wonder where it&#039;s all going. We are curious can you supply more details about this? I am a bit puzzles to how this will all add up. My pal did tell me yesterday, about the lines of what you really are referring to, yet it&#039;s still hard to believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is certainly truly worth it to read, and truly does make me wonder where it&#8217;s all going. We are curious can you supply more details about this? I am a bit puzzles to how this will all add up. My pal did tell me yesterday, about the lines of what you really are referring to, yet it&#8217;s still hard to believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Economic Arguments Against Keynesian Proposals Can Balance Out Pro-Spending Coverage - -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://timescheck.com/2010/07/15/economic-arguments-against-keynesian-proposals-can-balance-out-pro-spending-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-2133</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Economic Arguments Against Keynesian Proposals Can Balance Out Pro-Spending Coverage - -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timescheck.com/?p=575#comment-2133</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Times Check, Kevin Mooney. Kevin Mooney said: debunking Keynesians http://timescheck.com/2010/07/15/economic-arguments-against-keynesian-proposals-can-balance-out-pro-spending-coverage/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Times Check, Kevin Mooney. Kevin Mooney said: debunking Keynesians <a href="http://timescheck.com/2010/07/15/economic-arguments-against-keynesian-proposals-can-balance-out-pro-spending-coverage/" rel="nofollow">http://timescheck.com/2010/07/15/economic-arguments-against-keynesian-proposals-can-balance-out-pro-spending-coverage/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

