After cheerleading and crusading for the Obama Administration and its unpopular spending programs, the New York Times raises objections to a prospective U.S. Senate candidate who was a "cheerleader for Iraq." The paper would have more crediblity to ask hard questions if it did not run so many front page editorials laced with what is best described as "cheerleading"...
When The New York Times sees fit to call someone else a “cheerleader,” even as it cheerleads for the Obama Administration, a l...